Lorrie Wolfard, at Tarrant County College
â€œGender and Genre Issues in Kate Chopinâ€™s â€˜The Stormâ€™â€
4th year of college level teaching
Ren. and romantic Brit lit
Hardin-Simmons and UNC Chapel Hill, degrees
This is a live blogging of the session.
Rather than search for â€œthe one true transparency,â€ students consider several interpretations
â€œSo the storm passed and everyone was happyâ€ (Chopin 267).
reader does not expect happy ending
Because to be timeless, literature tends not to have a happy ending, except (sometimes) in fairy tales.
â€œThe Stormâ€ was not published until 1969, though it was written in 1898. Why not publish it till then and why publish it then? What was going on that allowed the publication then?
at time, sex = wifely duty
not what Chopin shoes
“happily ever after” could be wishful thinking, from cheating spouses
transparency 3: not taken at face value
horror genre– setting away from society, monster, villain who is warped
wonder tale- help us pay attention to changing condition of life, give us respect for life, not spoiled by conventionalism or power or rationalism (Zipes xviii)
fairy tale genre-
damsel in distress
prince on horseback
happy ever after
any joyful sex is fulfilling — a sort of fairy tale wish
predictable consequences to sex, so that the storyâ€™s ending only expresses the loversâ€™ wish fulfillment)
Chopin showing tension btw wish and reality
If, then, the use of the fairy tale genre is germane to this story, what insight does it provide?
fairy tale transparency -> clear evidence ending line not necessarily Chopin’s opinion of affair
intelligent readers know genre: thus a tale of happiness no more true than a â€œhappily ever afterâ€ fairy tale
- If she believed that everyone would recognize the fairy tale aspects, doesnâ€™t this mean that it could have been published? Is her failure to publish it an indication that she does not believe that it is a fairy tale, but is a realistic story which would not have been accepted by the culture of her day?